patching...
Update: Sign up for our free daily e-newsletter, and get Framingham news straight to your inbox every morning! » »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

AMC Theater Changes Policy in Wake of Aurora, Colorado Tragedy

AMC Framingham will show the new Batman movie but will not allow movie-goers to wear masks or carry fake weapons into the theater.

 

AMC Theatre Framingham will be showing The Dark Knight Rises tonight but has made changes to its security policy in regards to the film following an overnight shooting at a Colorado showing of the Batman film, in which 12 were killed and at least 50 injured.

In a statement on the company's Facebook page, AMC said it is reinforcing its security in the wake of the tragedy.

"AMC Theatres is deeply saddened by the Aurora tragedy. Movie going is part of our social fabric and this senseless act shakes us to our core. We’re reinforcing our security procedures with our theatre teams, which we cannot discuss in detail for obvious, safety reasons. Local law enforcement agencies, our landlords and their and our local security teams are stepping up nationwide to ensure we provide the safest environment possible for our guests. We couldn’t be more grateful for their collective support."

AMC also said that while The Dark Knight Rises will be played as scheduled, the company will not allow anyone in masks or with toy or costume weapons.

"At this time, our show schedules circuit-wide will not change. We will not allow any guests into our theatres in costumes that make other guests feel uncomfortable and we will not permit face-covering masks or fake weapons inside our buildings. If guests wish to exchange or refund any tickets, we will honor our existing policy and do as our guests wish. We are taking necessary precautions to ensure our guests who wish to enjoy a movie this weekend can do so with as much peace of mind as possible in these circumstances."

According to the Associated Press, a gunman threw tear gas into a midnight showing of the new film "The Dark Knight Rises" in Aurora, Colorado, before opening fire on the crowd.

What do you think? Did the Aurora tragedy make you change plans to see the movie? Do you think the security measures limiting masks and fake weapons are appropriate?

Share you thoughts in the comments below.


Related Topics: AMC Theatres

InfoWarrior508

4:49 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

I think that masks and fake weapons don't pose any threat to anyone, so to restrict such things is not only silly, but also reaffirms the notion that everyone should be paranoid/afraid. Are movie theaters going to start turning into airports? TSA searches next? And to put it out there - if more of the population was armed, incidents like this would never happen. Just look at the 71 year old hero in Florida who saved everyone from the robbers a few days ago.

Reply

David Nolta

7:59 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

If guns had been more difficult to obtain, this man might never have had them to begin with. And the latest report I read said that the shooter in Colorado had acquired his guns legally--which deflates the argument I've seen so often recently on The Patch, that the CRIMINALS all obtain their guns illegally. And do we really want a theater full of armed people? Does that really sound like a SAFER environment? The Old West was not a pretty scenario, and I for one do not want to see it brought back.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tklmnrt

8:42 am on Sunday, July 22, 2012

How many guns were used during 9-11? If we had these "laws" you yearn for I bet it would have never happened.

Jim Rizoli

10:37 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

This just makes more people wanting to go.
The excitement of being there to see if anything happens.
So what will the do next set up body scanners?
Jim@ccfiile.com

Reply

Kim Poness

10:37 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

I don't want to own a gun. I don't want to HAVE to own a gun. I don't want to shoot a gun. I don't have a problem with other people owning handguns or rifles, but I do draw the line at automatic weapons. Who are you defending, or what are you hunting, with an automatic weapon? I just don't understand it. I get the right to bear arms, but I find it hard to believe this is what our forefathers had in mind.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Loren

9:55 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Automatic weapons for the general population were outlawed in 1968. The clown in Aurora did not have automatic weapons. The Columbine murderers did not have automatic weapons. At Virginia Tech, that screwball did not have automatic weapons.

Jim Rizoli

10:37 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

Nice to see my comment "shot" off the site...
Jim@ccfiile.com

Reply

Joe Rizoli

10:37 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

David, you can't blame guns on this as the problem.
It would be like blaming the microwave oven if somebody put cat in it and killed it. If the man went to a legal process to purchase the gun then that is the legal process. I think the big thing that should be asked is what is making people in our society to go over the edge and do things like this.

 If movie theaters are going to go to policies where they they start bringing in more security then its time that the people that go to the movie theaters protest and stop going to the theaters.

Joe Rizoli

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

11:01 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

I did not blame this on the guns. But the guns are a factor, and one that is subject to better regulation. I wish this man had not been allowed to buy guns. But he was, and his actions are clear and tragic evidence that in fact guns are available legally to people who should not have them. And the suggestion made above that more guns would prevent this sort of massacre--really?? Again, really? More guns in a theater make us safer???? More guns in a shopping mall will enhance our shopping experience? More guns in cars will improve our security in traffic? Really???? Humans made the guns, humans can do a better job of limiting their availability, their use, their social acceptability, etc. And no, I don't think that Benjamin Franklin would disagree with me here.

Kira Gagarin

11:47 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

I agree with Kim 100% and she states it perfectly. I also have no interest in owning a gun. I have never seen one. In general I think the US's gun laws are too lax, but fine, Constitutional Right to bear arms, I get it. Automatic and semi automatic weapons though? I also don't think that is what was meant.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan Seavey

1:20 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Nobody's forcing you to buy a gun. And you've never seen one? How can you have an opinion on gun laws if you've never even seen one?

Ryan Seavey

12:12 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Forks are a factor in obesity, should we make them harder to obtain? Should we make the "Big mac's" more difficult to purchase, should cars be harder to buy?

Making Automatic Guns illegal would mean only criminals would have them. You don't solve a paper cut by slicing off the finger, because it only makes a bigger wound.

And yes, if more people in that theater had guns the situation would have undoubtedly been much less severe, to argue otherwise is just an exercise in stupidity. Why would you punish everybody for the actions of one?

I saw a car crash the other day, should every driver in the town suffer insurance penalties for the damage?

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

1:48 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Everything is a factor in everything else--but guns are the weapons used in this massacre, and people killing themselves over time by eating too much with forks is NOT the same thing as people killing a lot of OTHER people deliberately with guns. And I'm afraid I've never understood this idea that not being allowed to carry a dangerous weapon (much more dangerous than a fork, I'm sure we agree?) into public spaces where there are other people (usually unarmed, I assume we agree) is a "punishment". It's common sense. The difference between this tragedy and the car crash you describe? The targeting, the deliberation, and the ever-growing evidence that a LOT of people in America use guns (legally purchased as well as illegally obtained guns) to hurt other people--not at all a common practice associated with cars, or forks, for that matter. But we've been through this before, Ryan. I would only add here that it is not stupid to want to see a movie without being surrounded by automatic weapons--and it is NOT stupid to question your strong, unsupported opinion that more guns in that movie house would have meant less death. We ARE justified in speculating that ONE more person in that theater who thinks like the killer thought would have caused twice as much bloodshed--which is what many guns are for, after all.

Reply

Jim Rizoli

12:12 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

I'm all for guns but the automatic weapons stuff seems a bit "overkill" pardon the pun.
Jim@ccfiile.com

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim Poness

8:50 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

@Jim - my sentiments exactly. I'm just not sure what people are doing with automatic weapons?

Comment_arrow

Borderwatch

7:54 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

You cannot go into a gun store and buy an automatic weapon, it takes about 6 months to go thru along background check and a 200 dollar stamp. So many people drinking the media's koolaid. The media doesn't know the difference between a semi auto and full automatic weapon......

Ryan Seavey

12:22 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

And also anybody who say's that gun laws are too "lax" are severely uninformed, why don't you go get your license if it's so easy?

Really, educate yourselves before making such foolish statements.

learn the laws, the process for getting a license, and shoot a gun before making stupid comments on thing you clearly don't understand in the least bit.

Unless you have an armed Police officer with you 24/7 that is...

How about we start outlawing certain breeds of dogs in masses once a single animal bites somebody due to the owner? How about we outlaw cars that go above 60? Why would you need one that goes that fast? Let's outlaw alcohol while we're at it, nobody NEEDS it, so lets get rid of it. and nobody NEEDS cigarettes, so let's ban them, hell, those kill more people than gun's ever could. Plus they're bad for the environment.

I mean sure, criminals will still get they're hands on them, but good honest people wont have them at least...

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

12:35 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Good, honest people, like the man who legally purchased and carried those guns into that theater...

Comment_arrow

Kira Gagarin

12:55 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

I love when people analogize big macs and obesity to guns and killing people. Tobacco, alcohol, sugar, and dog bites are not comparable to tragedies like this one. I could get a gun license. In fact, being a solo attorney many many of my colleagues have fire arms. I do not want one.

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

8:50 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Ryan...if more people had guns in that theatre the situation would have been much less severe? Really? Think about that for a second...tear gas...dark theatre...people scared out of their wits and running anywhere they can...Thats a situation that definitely calls for more guns! I think I know what you mean...but I also think the only people who should own guns should be people who are trained to use them...I cannot offer an easy solution as there isn't one. I'd love to say that everyone should own a gun to protect ourselves from the "crazy" people that already have them! But I would suggest eliminating sales at gun shows.

Ryan Seavey

12:55 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Fully Automatic Guns are one of the most difficult thing to acquire in our society, and for the people who work their A***'s off to be able to buy one to suddenly be told they have to give them up due to the actions of a mentally disturbed individual or a criminal who BROKE THE LAW? That's UN-American. Like I said, we should also ban fast cars, because somebody may go to fast and BREAK THE LAW.

It's makes as much sense as closing all the movie theaters to solve the problem.

And just for the record, the guy didn't have an Automatic Weapon, he had a Pistol, a Shotgun, and a Semi-Auto Rilfe(that means one shot per trigger pull to all the gun illiterate folks)

So you all can stop bashing Full Auto Guns.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim Poness

8:50 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

@Ryan - automatic weapons always come into play in these conversations. And telling folks who are against them to "stop bashing" them is akin to tellng you to stop defending them.

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

12:10 pm on Sunday, July 22, 2012

Ryan....can you give me one reason why any honest person would need to own an automatic weapon? It can't be used for hunting. For sport maybe....but there are supervised ranges which will allow you to rent and shoot one without the fear of hitting an unintended target out there in the woods. Again I am not Anti Gun but i feel that laws need to be more similar from state to state. Instead of having states make up their own laws.

Ryan Seavey

12:55 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

@ David Nolta: So following your logic we should dis-arm police and military right?

After all, if one crooked cop shoots a person the rest should suffer, right?

I mean After the Fort Hood tragedy clearly nobody in the military should have guns either right? I mean cuz any one of them could just go crazy any time, right?

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

1:29 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Now you're talking! Imagine that world! But seriously (and for the thousandth time) I never said we should ban guns. I said we should make it harder for people to obtain them (because clearly some people who obtain them legally should not) and I think that people have a right to expect not to have guns near them in most places--they certainly don't belong in theaters, shopping malls, schools, churches, airports, on trains, etc., any more than they belong in the hands of children, drunks, or the mentally disturbed. So again, I am for regulating better WHO can get guns and WHERE it is acceptable to carry them.

Ryan Seavey

12:55 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Clearly nobody in that theater would have wanted a gun in that moment right? Because the police saved everybody right?
I mean, it's not like a person could have changed the outcome if they're not a cop right?

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

1:36 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

And again, the end of that logic is that everybody should have a gun at all times, and be ready to use it, and just hope everybody else stays in a good mood... And thus America takes a huge step backwards, and it's the wild west all over again. Except technology speeds up the carnage.

Ryan Seavey

1:20 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Also, can you link to an article that states that he was in fact legally licensed to have firearms? I cant seem to find any article that states that myself.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

1:31 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

The msn news site said earlier today that he is believed to have purchased the guns legally. As I'm going to bed, I hope you don't mind looking it up yourself.

Kim Comatas

1:32 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Forks, cars and microwaves were not built to kill. A firearm is meant to kill. That's it's main purpose. (for targets as well but Id argue not the MAIN function.) You can't use an argument like that when a major function of the design is to critically harm or kill. Not apples to apples.

If the crowd had been armed that night, given the tear gas and smoke from the discharged firearm reported that filled the theater, it would have resulted in even more deaths - IMO. No one could see. Imagine multiple shooters in that chaos?

Saying no masks and fake weapons is like saying no one could wear trench coats to school after Colombine. Makes no sense all.

Its our constitutional right to have firearms. That's not up for discussion or worth getting upset over since that's not changing. This guy did everything according to the law. Clean record, legally owned. Not sure what could have changed?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rob Penzke

8:42 am on Sunday, July 22, 2012

Exactly!! I like to add that it's easy to go to the range and practice on paper targets but in a dark theater, with tear gas, people running all over the place and the adrenaline rush, it is not that easy. Also take this in to account, the perp was wearing body armor.

Dave Lenane

12:10 pm on Sunday, July 22, 2012

I'd like to add that guns purchased legally in a store are subject to the gun laws of the state they are sold in. However what about guns sold through private sellers? Someone who bought a gun legally, and then decided they just didn't want it anymore. There are even websites for people to auction of the guns....a gun ebay if you will. I am coming around to the side of those who claim we need tougher laws against guns. And Ryan...it is VERY easy to turn a semi automatic into fully auto if you have some knowlege of how guns work and are mechanically inclined...

Reply

Dave Lenane

12:10 pm on Sunday, July 22, 2012

Sorry...last thing from me on this subject for a bit! In the State of Colorado, if you have a clean record, you can walk in to a gun store and walk out with a gun the same day! In order to carry it concealed you would need to apply for a permit, but I mean really?

http://www.wdtv.com/wdtv.cfm?func=view&section=5-News&item=How-Hard-Is-It-To-Purchase-A-Gun-In-Our-State4283

Reply

BigTex

10:08 pm on Monday, July 23, 2012

Ok. Let's make guns ALL guns illegal right now!!! Effective immediately!! Just like cocaine....just like heroin....Crack...Meth..all illegal and ALL still a problem in America. Making things hard to get doesn't keep a person who wants it from getting it. My next statement is for those who dont understand semi auto weapons rights. Our founding fathers are quoted in numerous document stating that a WELL ARMED (which meant at the time and now the weapons closest to the military as possible) is vital to the citizens of a free state to protect us from GOVERNMENT! Without a well armed population any government can pass laws or taxes or ANYTHING they want....have you ever heard of the Revolutionary War. If all they had were pistols and not the same weapons as the British army we would be BRITS!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

10:37 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Mr. Big....being a history major...I think our forefathers were talking about a well armed MILITIA. The right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Constitution. How about the right to wear body armor? Nope! Don't see THAT anywhere in there.....

BigTex

10:28 pm on Monday, July 23, 2012

Here is what you need to ask yourself ALL people against guns. If you are in a movie theater and a crazy man walks in and starts shooting as he walks up the rows getting closer to you at that moment if someone handed you a gun and said "here you go...now you have a chance" would you tell him no I don't like guns... the police are on their way...they will get here before he reaches my row.

Reply

Kim Poness

11:01 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

@BigTex - ah, fear and consumption. Nice.

Reply

BigTex

11:25 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Dave, good to hear about being a history major. Without knowing our past we can not make way for the future. What made up the Militia back then? Anyone pulled from the population that could shoot a gun! And without a population willing and able to revolt no right is guaranteed! History has proven that. As for body armor...I could care less if we can get that or not. @ Kim your comment has no validity. It's called living in the real world...people do bad things..horrible things...i wish this wasnt true but it is. So that said, I would rather have my pistol under my shirt and have a chance if one of those people cross my path so I at least have a chance to go home to my family. And maybe save your life too if we are in the room together!

Reply

Dave Lenane

11:57 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

@Tex...How are you going to save Kim's life, when you arent even brave enough to use your real name?

Reply

BigTex

12:23 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

There is a time and place to prove ones bravery. Something I have had at times daily in my life and know well that a chat room is not the place to prove anything to any man or woman.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Susan Petroni

12:27 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

@BigTex - Dave & Kim are asking for you to use your real first and last name as the majority of the posters on the Framingham Patch site do post with their full real names - so we can have civil conversations.

As this article was cross-posted on numerous sites, I have not enforced the first name and last name rule, but it would be nice if you updated your profile to use your first and last name.

Reply

Jim Rizoli

12:55 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Just to let you know what the Govt. is up to.
http://tinyurl.com/7tf6x5s
They love when things like this happen as it adds to their case against YOU owning a gun. So they are making sure you can't get the bullets. Brilliant!
Smart move, too bad most people don't see it.
Jim@ccfiile.com

Reply

Dave Lenane

1:12 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Tex...Jim....I'm not against people owning guns. But I am all for the Federal Government laying down laws about who can have them. Gun laws, in my opinion, should not differ state to state. Is it ok to walk into a gun store and walk out with a semi automatic rifle the same day? That makes no sense. In Colorado you can buy a gun, but then you have to wait for a license to carry it? I wonder how many are actually doing that? This is an area where the Government should have more authority. How many 6 year olds have to die because of how easy it is to buy a gun in certain states? How about a national waiting period of say 30 days for you to pick up your legally purchased gun, and your background checked license? Is that to much to ask? And how about body armor cannot be sold on the internet? Any problems there? How about no private sales of guns? If you want to sell yours, go to a gun store and get what you can. If you are found to have sold it privately, then you would face a stiff sentence. Are these acceptable ideas? Guns should only be in the hands of people who are trained and know how to use them.

Reply

BigTex

1:31 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Dave, first let me say I have enjoyed this conversation with you. I understand the point about the background checks.... the extending days to get a gun....all that makes sense. The horrible truth is even if you do all that...even if all guns are illegal tomorrow...or even if you have crazy steps to take to get any type of gun. You can't stop crazy...you can't stop evil. Bad people will still get guns however they have to they will wait however long they have to wait.... and do bad things just like illegal drugs. Again I have enjoyed you cross talk and Susan thank you for letting me post my opinion on your site. Your friend-Big Tex

Reply

Dave Lenane

1:40 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

@ Tex ...I enjoyed it as well. I completely understand what your point. I actually hate the idea of having more government...because you know they would set up like 15 different committees for gun sales! I just feel that we have to do something, instead of shedding tears, shaking our fists and doing nothing!

Reply

Leave a comment