As many Patch readers know, it is not uncommon for commenters on this site to:
- Be mean and overly critical for no apparent reason;
- Focus on one negative thing in a story and comment on that and only that, sometimes over and over again;
- Have tons of spare time to do so;
- Get very angry about something that many other people do not think is a big deal; and
- Often do all of this anonymously (which I find cowardly).
I know of at least one other Patch blogger who thinks twice about posting anything because of concern that any topic, no matter how safe it may seem, will be somehow twisted into President Obama being the Antichrist (or something along those lines).
My last post was tied into the apparent demise of Hostess. Meant to be a walk down Sugary-Snack Lane, it became a place to comment on unions, mismanagement, my being a crappy writer, corporate greed, and maybe some other things (I stopped reading after a while). I thought I was just writing about Twinkies.
This post will include a free service to such commenters (and yes, I know all commenters are not like the ones described above).
Covered below are the best books I've read in 2012. Maybe you'll like some of them, yourself. Maybe you'll see one you think will make a nice Christmas gift for someone else. That is the intent of the post.
But, for the cynical, angry, and nit-picky among us, I'll also include a reason you should criticize the book, the author, the blogger, or, just society in general, while I happen to be recommending this book.
Our first category is Short Stories, a genre that doesn't seem to get too much attention these days, but should.
"Astray" by Emma Donoghue
- Why should you read it: Donoghue took snippets of history - newspaper clippings, old letters, etc. - and crafted them into compelling works of fiction. One of the best books I read this year.
- Something to criticize: Donoghue is not a member of Team Heterosexual. Thankfully, she's Irish and lives in Canada, so she couldn't vote for Obama or Elizabeth Warren, nor is she likely to push for gay marriage in the USA and contribute to the downfall of our great nation.
"Light Lifting" by Alexander MacLeod
- Why you should read it: MacLeod's dad, Alistair MacLeod, is one of my favorite authors, although he's published relatively little in his career. After reading reviews of this book, I thought I'd see if the apple fell close to the tree, and it did. Interesting situations, characters I cared about, and great (though not always clean) endings in every story. I had to buy it in Canada, though it's since become available on Amazon in the US.
On a somewhat related note, my dad is a CPA and very good with numbers, while I still sometimes count on my fingers. Dad/son skill sets don't always work out as well as they did for the MacLeod boys. - Something to criticize: Not only is MacLeod from Canada, a nation that still somehow endures despite having a government health plan, but he is also a college professor, which I'm sure makes him elitist and anti-American. He probably prefers Labatt's or Molson over Budweiser, as well.
"Dark Lies the Island" by Kevin Barry
- Why you should read it: It has something for everyone. Young love ("Across the Rooftops); a beer tasting trip, where not much happens, but much is revealed ("Beer Trip to Llandudno"); physical and mental peril ("Fjord of Killary"). A great read.
- Something to criticize: "The Girls and the Dogs" is about a guy on the run who hides out at a rundown farm, whose occupants are undoubtedly on some sort of public assistance, and dragging down the rest of society because of it.
Next up, a few non-fiction selections.
"Churchill" by Paul Johnson
- Why you should read it: An excellent and succinct biography (from 2010, I just got to it this year) of a man whose contributions to his country are nearly impossible to calculate. I really felt like I knew the guy a little bit after reading this book. Of all the biographies I've read over the years, there are only a few that, even though I knew it was coming, I still felt bad when the subject died at the end. This is one of them. It whet my appetite to one day tackle William Manchester's "The Last Lion" Churchill trilogy (when I'm ready to read about 3,000 pages about one guy).
- Something to criticize: Like Ted Kennedy, Churchill was born into a wealthy family and was a career politician. He was born in a palace! Clearly must have been an elitist.
"Buddy" by Brian McGrory
- Why you should read it: I love dogs, but we don't have the time, space, or money for a pet. "Buddy" is McGrory's story of how he went from owning a Golden who was his best friend, to marrying into a family that came with a private menagerie, including Buddy, a rooster who loathed him (to put it mildly).
"Buddy" is about more than that, though. It's about how McGrory changed as a person through his family and (gulp), even through Buddy. It almost made me want to go buy some chickens. Not roosters, though; I'd never buy a pet that causes testicular endangerment. - Something to criticize: McGrory's day job is writing a column for "The Boston Globe," a left-wing rag supported by elite Democrats and only still in business by the grace of God, its Sports section, and "The New York Times" (not necessarily in that order).
"Johnson's Life of London" by Boris Johnson
- Why you should read it: You'll learn something new about London and a lot of people who called it home. From Roman times (Boudica) to modern times (Keith Richards), London's Mayor Boris Johnson spends a chapter on some of the most interesting and influential people in London's history, and includes snippets about the city along the way. I flew through this book, and didn't want it to end.
- Something to criticize: How does a guy run a city and find the time to write a book at the same time? Johnson is the English version of our Governor Deval Patrick - two men with high-profile, supposedly high-responsibility jobs, who have the time to write a book. I barely have the time to write these posts, and I barely proofread.
Next time: Favorite Novels of 2012, just in time to stuff a stocking.
William Burke
2:23 am on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Crappy review, if it was supposes to have been funny I did not find it so.
Kay Wallace
9:24 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
I enjoyed it. People are way too serious and have a sour opinion on everything. I'm sure someone will disagree with this too.
Andy Koenigsberg
9:36 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
I like Molson Ale better than Budweiser.
Jon McGrath
11:51 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
I like just about anything better than Budweiser.
William Burke
10:44 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
Kay, you seem very sour on my on my opinion it's just my opinion and just on this. :)
Dave Lenane
6:52 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Jon...dont worry about what others do or say here. Its easy to hide behind a keyboard and criticize the works of others. I gave up on this site and am getting ready to do so again. Get a blog on wordpress.com where u can write to your hearts content and get honest feedback from literate people who actually can exchange opinions and ideas.
That being said I enjoyed your well thought out post. The books you reviewed may not be my cup of tea, however you made great arguments. Looking forward to your opinions on novels! This time of year I get stuck reading the same authors who make sure to come out with a book at Christmas...Baldacci...Grisham...etc. Merry Christmas!
William Burke
11:05 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
I find it extremely funny how Mister McGrath received 1 negative comment(mine) And people seemed to be acting like he has been persecuted. I am sorry if I hurt your feeling Mister McGrath and I am sure as a writer you have thicker skin than that but it was just my opinion and I believe that all opinions are valid.
Dave Lenane
11:35 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
William...talk about thin skin! Why say anything negative about this column at all? Some opinions should just be kept to yourself. The man is reviewing books and not telling you how to live your life.
Aside to Patch editors...this is why people have stopped writing creative blogs. Have you noticed how few submissions you get now? Its just not worth it. Its also why its just not worth visiting this site.
Jay Burke
1:31 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Jon, please know that many (and perhaps secretly most?) of us appreciate the effort that goes into posting here, and especially the act of laying yourself and your opinions out there for the public. I find it fascinating, and probably more telling about the commenters than the writers of the original content, that people will take the time to offer criticism without any recommendations for how something might be made better. In any event, thanks for your reviews and for your ongoing contributions. Cheers.
Andy Koenigsberg
9:26 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
It is nice to see that everyone here is using their real names to post comments. So many commenters hide behind aliases. One person even admitted he was afraid of losing business if us liberals (meaning me at the time) knew who he was. Whatever, as the recipient of many negative comments or personal attacks, I have learned to just shrug it off (even if I don't like the comments) and respond to the substance, if there is any. I am sticking with the Patch for now because it is a good local venue, despite its faults.
Jon McGrath
8:55 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
I wasn't looking for or expecting a rally of support, but I'll take it! Andy, I've heard similar stories. People who want to say positive things have told me they don't want to comment because they don't want to deal with the potential backlash. It's unfortunate, but maybe something we can still work to turn around.
Andy Koenigsberg
9:31 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
I know you weren't looking for support - mostly I was observing that it was refreshing to see people have the "courage" to identify themselves. It's hard to put yourself out there but as someone who used to be an avid (or maybe rabid based on one's point of view) letter-to-the-editor writer, I am comfortable, more or less, with writing for public venues.
Ron Goodenow
9:51 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Great post Jon. Recently I mentioned in the Patch that as a historian I did a lot of reading, particularly about the rise of totalitarianism in Germany and Russia, and some lessons that might be learned as we look at manifestations of extremism here. One of our local tea party sages came back with how I shouldn't be reading history. Andy gets the same thing from bagger science deniers after he writes something on climate change....know nothingism as a virtue. This said I would recommend the fiction of Alan Furst and Philip Kerr, and new non-fiction literature on Germany, Russia and WII by Beevor, Tooze, Gerwarth and Hastings. I'd be happy to elaborate, and may do that after I work off my Christmas list. Hey Andy, Molson Canadian is great -- and cheap here. Favorite beer of Alex McKnight in the Steve Hamilton series.
As for aliases, it has been a long time bone of contention for me. In general, Patchworld permits them, running counter to many online blog and comment services -- they mean lots of clicks. At the end of the day much depends on the discretion of individual editors and I must say that we're pretty lucky in Nboro, where alias rants are kept to a minimum.