.

Foreclosure Bill Passes Senate Includes Loan Modification

A bill sponsored by Sen. Karen Spilka (D-Ashland) passed through the senate last week. The bill will expand loan modification requirements in foreclosures.

Editor's Note: the following is a press release from the office of state Sen. Karen Spilka regarding Senate passage of a bill to prevent foreclosures.

The Senate Wednesday, in its latest effort to establish greater protections for homeowners, passed legislation preventing unnecessary and unlawful foreclosures, reducing the number of abandoned properties across the Commonwealth and helping to remove one of the biggest remaining barriers to our ongoing economic recovery.

“In spite of our improving economy, the foreclosure crisis continues to have a ripple effect throughout the state, seriously impacting our residents, our communities and the Commonwealth as a whole,” said Senator Karen Spilka (D-Ashland), the bill’s sponsor. “This legislation takes a common sense approach to keep people in their homes by ensuring fair negotiations and avoiding unnecessary foreclosures, which is good for our residents, our communities, and is ultimately more profitable for the creditor. Today was an important step forward to protect our struggling homeowners, combat the foreclosure crisis, and stabilize the housing market and our overall economy.”

“The foreclosure crisis has hurt many people and has taken a toll on our communities,” Senate President Therese Murray (D-Plymouth) said. “In many cases there just hasn’t been a concerted effort to treat people fairly, make these loans work and keep people in their homes. There’s a way to do this, and this bill is strong step forward. Senator (Anthony) Petruccelli, Senator (Karen) Spilka and the Attorney General have worked hard on this legislation and deserve a lot of credit for advancing a solution to this crisis.”

“The Senate today has taken another critical step in our effort to assist struggling homeowners in Massachusetts and ensure that Massachusetts fully recovers from the foreclosure crisis,” said Attorney General Martha Coakley, who filed the original bill. “These first-in-the-nation standards will promote reasonable loan modifications that keep people in their homes without requiring banks to sacrifice the bottom line. We thank Senate President Murray, Chairman Petruccelli and Senator Spilka for their leadership on this important issue and we look forward to continuing to work with the Legislature to prevent unnecessary foreclosures and help move our economy forward.”

The bill requires banks and other lenders to offer loan modifications to borrowers in certain circumstances to avoid foreclosures. Lenders must conduct a complete financial analysis of the borrower and determine if it would be more beneficial to receive lower monthly mortgage payments or the anticipated recovery from aforeclosure.

There is a 150-day timeframe for deciding whether or not to offer the loan modification which may come in the form of a reduced interest rate or principal, or an extension of the loan repayment period. The modified loans would allow borrowers to stay in their homes, lenders to avoid foreclosure costs and potential market losses, and neighborhoods to avoid the problem of abandoned properties and vacant lots.

Loan modifications would be available for owner-occupied homes and apply to loans that are considered risky, such as adjustable rate mortgages and interest-only loans. The bill compliments the work of loan modification specialists in the Attorney General’s Office who assist borrowers in their negotiations with lenders.

The legislation also includes a provision, added by an amendment from SenatorSpilka during today’s debate, that gives borrowers the right to go into mediation with lenders prior to foreclosure proceedings to work out renegotiated loan terms through a neutral third-party. Under the bill, the mediation program will be run by the Massachusetts Office of Public Collaboration at the University of Massachusetts Boston.

The bill also incorporates a recent Supreme Judicial Court decision requiring lenders to prove they are the current legal holder of a mortgage before commencing aforeclosure.

The legislation also does the following:

  • Prohibits lenders from passing on to third parties the costs of correcting prior improper foreclosures;
  • Prohibits lenders from imposing a fee upon a borrower for goods or services not provided in connection with a foreclosure; and
  • Requires the Division of Banks, in consultation with the Attorney General’s Office, to track the resolution of certain mortgage loans and report to the Joint Committee on Financial Services within 90 days of the end of each calendar year through December 31, 2017.

In 2010, the Legislature passed legislation that states tenants in foreclosed buildings can only be evicted for just cause and that lenders cannot evict a tenants for failure to pay rent unless a written notice with proper contact information has been posted and delivered. For homeowners, that legislation also temporarily extended the 90-day right-to-cure period, enacted by the Legislature in 2007, to 150 days. The 2007 law gave homeowners 90 days to come up with past due payments on their mortgage before the lender could require full payment of the unpaid balance. This was intended as a cooling off period for the lender and homeowner to work out a new payment plan to avoid foreclosure.

Jim Rizoli June 12, 2012 at 03:04 AM
As usual they react after the fact. Do they go after those that lied and cheated their way in obtaining said mortgages? Do they go after the bankers and loan companies that turned a blind eye to the qualifications of said people? Do they prosecute the said bankers and mortgage companies that made obscene profits from the whole mortgage scam? No! They just make it look like it was an unfortunate occurrence with no rhyme or reason. Hate to tell you....there was rhyme and reason for the mortgage debacle and many had their hands in the till. The Real estate people, bankers, loan companies....all those that touched the paper work on a house being bought or sold. All these people were part of it directly or indirectly. So Karen thanks for doing your best to deflect the problem away from the real issue. We all know that even you and your buddies at the State house indirectly benefit from all the mess. All those who made a killing on the scam most likely donated to your campaigns. You got love politics........ Jim@ccfiile.com
Joe Rizoli June 12, 2012 at 08:24 PM
The whole house mortage market is a usury scam in the first place. If the mortage companies and lenders we now have existed back in Colonial times they would all be in jail or kicked out of their churches for violating the usury laws. Read the book "Heavenly Merchandise" by Mark Valeri to see how far the apple has fallen from the tree. Especially what happened to a man called Robert Keayne. The criminals here aren't the home owners they are the greedy bankers and lenders who instead of continuing Christian principles denouncing usury have followed another way called Talmudic lending which continued usury and put us where we are at now. Nobody should be paying in interest for a life loan equal or more to the original cost of the house. That is usury. Joe Rizoli

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something