News Alert
Wickford Bridge Grand Opening Ceremony Scheduled

House Agrees to Tree Cutting Amendment Filed By Framingham Reps

Framingham's trio of state representatives filed an amendment to hold utility companies, like NSTAR, responsible for the removal and cutting of trees.

Responding to concerns from residents, Framingham's trio of state representatives filed an amendment to hold utility companies, including NSTAR, responsible for the removal and cutting of trees. The amendment would also require utilities to replace any damaged trees and plants already cut by utility companies.

Since May,

The amendment, which passed the Massachusetts House of Representatives at the end of June, would require utility companies to file their vegetation paring plans with the state Department of Public Utilities, who will review plans every four years, work with the companies to tweak the proposals, and hold public hearings prior to plan approval.

Framingham State Representatives Chris Walsh, Tom Conroy, and Tom Sannicandro filed a joint amendment to House Bill 4198: An act relative to competitively priced electricity that addresses tree clearing along utility easements, according to a press release issued by the three representatives.

“This amendment really addresses the crux of the problems with the clear cutting of the easements that have so traumatized homeowners,” said Walsh in a press statement. "We were looking to create assurances that residents would not be faced with the loss of quality of their environment or home values due to insensitive transmission line maintenance.”

“We made good progress with our amendment to the energy legislation to help the people of ," said Conroy in a press statement. “We will continue to push for this amendment to become law so that those who have lost trees, shrubs, and other vegetation in their yards will receive at least partial restoration of their property and the values of their homes.”

In May, Framingham Patch was the first to report about the

Since that report, A month later,

“This amendment attempts to address the concerns our constituents have expressed because of recent clear-cutting,” said Sannicandro in a press statement. “Replacing the trees and plant life that’s been lost is important to the quality of life in our community.”

"We have a good working relationship with state and local officials and work hard to balance their commitment to their constituents with our commitment to providing safe, reliable electric service.  We’ve done extensive outreach to discuss the importance of this work and our easement rights to keep these transmission corridors clear of any vegetation that could result in widespread power outages, said NSTAR spokesperson Mike Durand in a written statement.

Jim Rizoli July 03, 2012 at 04:57 AM
It's amazing the things people make laws for. There are other more important things going on around us that need much more attention. Be it as it may....the cost of these rules and regulations WILL be paid by the consumer. I'm not saying that NSTAR didn't do anything wrong, but in the long run ALL cost will be past on to consumer. Sure things will look nice but you're paying for it. Jim@ccfiiile.com
Joe Rizoli July 03, 2012 at 08:39 PM
Let me get this . You want land that the NSTAR owns, to have people that border their land, to control NSTARS land? How would you like if this was reversed? Am I missing something here? If it was reversed it would be called communism or totalism. I am no fan of big business here but come on people. What if NSTAR got political pundits to make a law FORCING you people to plant certain trees forcing YOU untold thousands of dollars on Your land? How would that go down with you all? Joe Rizoli


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »